|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Zaraz Zaraz
Imperial Planetology Academy
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 23:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:"..CCP and the CSM have been feverishly discussing the total elimination of non-consensual wardecs, too." WTF? Now I'm not one to normally say "If 'x' happens I will resign my subscription", but if this asshattery happens I will. I put about $400-500 annually into the EVE universe (above subscriptions) because I can't be bothered humping asteroids or day trading to fund my pvp. CCP needs to ask itself, do you want to lose players like me on your road to nerfdom? (I almost quit when can-flipping and ganking got nerfed, doing this is without a doubt the last straw for me...) p.s. Yes, if this happens, someone can have my stuff. F
Dude. Its just a game.
|
Zaraz Zaraz
Imperial Planetology Academy
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 23:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Takseen wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote: You can talk to people, without being in corp with them. Heck, you can fleet with them, get bonuses from them, research BPOs for them, do mining ops with them, run missions with them, on and on and on... without being in corp with them.
So ironically, Eve corporations are a liability for doing business in Eve. Unsarcastically, yes. In some ways they are as they expose you to risk regarding their actions without offering much in return. In a game that promotes paranoia no less.
CCP are a funny lot. They create a game where they foster behavior that would get you an ASBO in the UK but you can't say "I'm taking the ****" on the forums, using a colloquial word for urine. Like we are naughty children or something... But then encouraging these 'children' to be little psychos? Wierd.
|
Zaraz Zaraz
Imperial Planetology Academy
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.06 23:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:Skorpynekomimi wrote:War has to MEAN something for it to be anything other than griefing.
Right now, it's either a griefer wardec causing an indy corp to evaporate or just not undock for the duration, or a smaller force dec-ing a larger one and just being laughed off. Give incentives for the smaller corps to fight, or for it to be viable for indy corps to wardec other indy corps to cause competition. It always means something... it means someone hates you Would be nice if that were true. A personal hatred would at least be more tangible and easier to swallow than just wanting easy targets or padding a KB.
I imagine most PVP happens to pad KB with easy targets and if KB were removed most people who profess themselves to be PVPers would unsub and go play CoD or something instead.
|
Zaraz Zaraz
Imperial Planetology Academy
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 23:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote: Making highsec safer? That's what highsec is all about !
I know this is intended to be sarcastic, but... well... yeah. Why not? If you don't like safe space, don't be in high sec.
Many players want it to be safe for them but unsafe for their targets...
So they don't go into low/null (where it would be unsafe for them), they stay in highsec where they feel safer and where the mission runners and miners think its safe and they make it unsafe.
|
Zaraz Zaraz
Imperial Planetology Academy
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 23:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:EVE gets more World of War crack style everyday. Move level 3 and 4 missions to low, allow war dec's to follow players who bail fromp corp and prevent seasoned players from entering NPC corps.
EVE is a multiplayer game, people who disagree should pull out their net cable and play freelancer. Having decs follow pilots, or preventing those pilots from being in NPC corps will not result in those pilots participating in war. They will just log into an alt who is not at war, or if there are none, start a buddy account so they can create some that are not at war. Or just play a different game for the duration. Again, you cannot force a player to log in. People who do not like war not saying they do not like multiplayer games, they just do not want to participate in this one particular type of multiplayer interaction. Eve is such a wide open game that it has far far more ways of interaction.
Have the wardec follow the pilot into the NPC corp. War deccer gets more targets and NPC corp players get to fleet with their NPC navy units in caps and supers and hot-drop the war deccer in highsec.
(I see no reason why the NPC navies can't light cynos in their own space, they control the cyno jammers).
This would introduce risk to the wardeccing party and isn't that what Eve is all about? Wardec a highsec corp, someone leaves that highsec corp and goes into an NPC corp and now you have a war with a highsec corp that can drop caps and supers on you. Risk. Eve. Pewpew.
|
Zaraz Zaraz
Imperial Planetology Academy
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.09 09:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Zaraz Zaraz wrote:Have the wardec follow the pilot into the NPC corp. War deccer gets more targets and NPC corp players get to fleet with their NPC navy units in caps and supers and hot-drop the war deccer in highsec.
(I see no reason why the NPC navies can't light cynos in their own space, they control the cyno jammers).
This would introduce risk to the wardeccing party and isn't that what Eve is all about? Wardec a highsec corp, someone leaves that highsec corp and goes into an NPC corp and now you have a war with a highsec corp that can drop caps and supers on you. Risk. Eve. Pewpew. Yes. A Caldari Navy slowcat fleet jumps in on your Caracal that just scrammed a "NPC corp" freighter. Completely balanced, and makes highsec safer. You know what, how about we DON'T have this, and when the bad guy shoots you, CONCORD shows up and wastes them?
Thats totally not what I'm talking about and you know it.
|
|
|
|